ELECTIONS 2012 USA
Thursday, March 29, 2012

http://sadhillnews.com/2012/03/27/but-sad-hill-how-can-we-profit-from-all-the-trayvon-martin-race-baiting

Oh come on, give me a tough one… but since you asked.

trayvon martin george zimmerman race-baiting obama photo media bias sad hill news

Let’s assume Sybrina Fulton [yes, her last name is different than her son Trayvon Martin aka "@NO_LIMIT_NIGGA"] recently trademarked the phrases “I am Trayvon” and “Justice for Trayvon” forall the right reasons. (ahem)

Point being, the budding entrepreneur could simply trademark various phrases containing, ‘Trayvon”, with or without “Martin.”

But if that ain’t yo’ thang, you’ll need to go deep inside Trayvon Martin’s ‘culture‘ to produce effective taglines…

trayvon martin george zimmerman race-baiting obama photo media bias sad hill news-7

~

Or, you could grab some hoodies, Skittles® and iced tea, then parade your kids around town.

trayvon martin george zimmerman race-baiting obama photo media bias sad hill news-3

~

OK. Now the parents…

trayvon martin george zimmerman race-baiting obama photo media bias sad hill news-4

~

Uh, oh. Our race-baiting President of the United States who forever linked his name with Trayvon Martin is getting ideas…

MORE

------------------------------

http://themadjewess.com/category/kill-zimmerman/

Kill Zimmerman Twitter Account Initiated

https://twitter.com/#!/KillZimmerman

Kill Zimmerman Twitter account is initiated. On it states, this page is 4 Ppl who believe Zimmerman should be shot dead in the street the same way Trayvon was.  No Justice No Peace.

No due process of law required. This is the example of our government/civil leaders who have led in disgrace of public discourse.  This is their call for civility. Vigilantism is alive and well in America.

By the way, Palin is blamed/responsible for the cross-hairs used in the photo.

Kill Zimmerman Active Twitter Account Click Here



Publicado por Corazon7 @ 2:19 PM
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

http://sadhillnews.com/2012/03/29/perhaps-the-most-insightful-comment-on-the-trayvon-martin-culture-plus-2nd-round-of-trayvon-martin-tweets-found

obma trayvon martin george zimmerman photos images race-baiting obama photo media bias sad hill news

I’m over this government-subsidized Travyon Martin media fiasco. And I plan to stop covering it unless/until the riots – provoked by our race-baiting president and select black men openly putting out ‘consequence-free’ contracts and ‘soft’ hits on George Zimmerman – begin.

Last night it hit me. There is something all too familiar about Obama’s zeal for praising rebellion and aligning himself with it. Egypt. I called him on it. So did every other conservative out there, including Rush Limbaugh,

Obama can’t complain if we go Egypt on him because he said that’s how democracy works, that’s what he said on Friday.  This is the way real democracy works, so he can’t complain if it happens to him, and it will.”

Ladies and gentleman, I present to you our Nobel ‘Peace’ Prize winning president…

obama nobel peace prize egypt protest mubarak egyptian protestors waving riot sad hill news

~

Right. On with the 2nd round of thug-like Tweets from Trayvon Martin (‘insightful comment’ follows):

Second Trayvon Martin Twitter Feed Identified

(Daily Caller) The Daily Caller has identified a second Twitter handle that was used by the late Trayvon Martin during the last weeks of 2011.  Tweeting in December under the name “T33ZY TAUGHT M3,” Martin sent a message that read, “Plzz shoot da #mf dat lied 2 u!”

It’s unclear who Martin intended the message for, or whether he intended it to be taken literally.

The photo Martin chose to represent himself on Twitter as “T33ZY TAUGHT M3″ depicts him in a black Polo cap, looking into the camera and extending his middle finger. The photo’s file name on Twitter’s server indicates that it was taken on the afternoon of June 17, 2010.

obma trayvon martin george zimmerman photos images race-baiting obama photo media bias sad hill news-1

(courtesy of Daily Caller)

At least one website issued a retraction this week after mistakenly linking Martin to a middle-finger-salute image on a Facebook account corresponding to a Georgia teenager who shares Martin’s name. This image, however, was uploaded to Twitter by the teen himself.

On Tuesday TheDC published 152 pages of  Martin’s Twitter activity that were retrieved using the social analytics product PeopleBrowsr.

Additional searches via the same website yielded the Twitter handle “T33ZY TAUGHT M3,” whose activity spanned just one month and ended shortly before Martin began tweeting as “NO_LIMIT_NIGGA.” His Twitter activity under that newer screen name began with the tweet: “NEW NAME, NEW BACKGROUND, NEW TWEETCON, I MAKE CHANGS B4 NEW YEARS!”

~snip~

Perhaps the most insightful comment I’ve come across regarding the Trayvon Martin ‘culture’ – Sad Hill:

thephranc –

“But if you don’t act like this you are “acting white” and a porch nigger. Those of us who step out of this culture trap are beaten by these thugs and called the most vile things. But success is the best revenge and while all those losers are in jail or on welfare I’m still acting white and owning businesses. I also wont hire these thugs. Not only do the fail basic math and English they have no people skills. Its a self perpetuating cycle of worthlessness.”

obama if i had a son he'd look like trayvon birth certificate sad hill news 3

Black men issuing contracts and ‘soft’ hits on George Zimmerman: HERE

BREAKING NEWS: liberal ‘mainstream’ media releases new photos of Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman: HERE

The Trayvon Martin our government-subsidized media won’t let you see: HERE

The last Tweets of Trayvon Martin: HERE

Obama, ‘If I had a son, he’d look like…’: HERE

But Sad Hill, how can we profit from all the Trayvon Martin race-baiting?: HERE

Washington Post and CBS receive $2 million in ObamaCare Taxpayer subsidies: HERE

American Holocaust – Obama defends the extermination of 54+ million lives: HERE

Obama praises Egyptian protestors: HERE

Barack Hussein Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize: HERE

We go ‘Egypt’ on Obama – that’s how democracy works: HERE

Democrat Official credits Obama with Mubarak resignation: HERE

Obama honors Nobel winner with a statement about himself: HERE

Nobel winner, Obama, misquotes another Nobel winner, Martin Luther King, Jr.: HERE

Obama, bad egg: HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:58 PM
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Friday, March 23, 2012

Friday, March 23, 2012

Immigration Records for Foreign Flights into Hawaii Week of Obama's Birth Missing

Immigration records missing for week of Obama's birthArpaio's team probing possibility president born abroadJerome Corsi @ WNDExcerpt "After months of searching, investigators commissioned by Maricopa...

Washington Times: Obama Identity Document Fraud Biggest Scandal in American History

Washington Times Writer Jeff Kuhner on TruNews: Obama has Perpetrated a Massive Hoax and Fraud upon the American People; Obama Document Fraud Biggest Scandal in American History; Much Bigger than Watergate;...

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Fox News' The Five: What If We Send Kids to Kenya to Find Obama's Birth Certificate?

Fox News' The Five: What If We Send Kids to Kenya to Find Obama's Birth Certificate? - 3/22/2012 - VIDEO HERE Vetting the Resident: Second Sheriff Joe Press Conference Set For March 31, 2012 ...

Video: Lord Monckton: Obama's Birth Certificate Plainly a Forgery; Very Serious Matter

Lord Monckton: ‘I’m no birther,’ but Obama birth certificate ‘plainly a forgery’Jeff Poor @ Daily CallerAUDIO BELOW EXCERPTS "On Dennis Miller’s radio show Thursday Lord Christopher Monckton, a former...

Second Sheriff Joe Press Conference Set For March 31: Media Blackout Continues

Media blackout continues on Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigationLinda Bently @ Sonoran News ‘This will be an historic event in Arizona. Please come and be a part of history. The public is invited to...

Jerome Corsi: People of Interest in Obama's Forged Selective Service Card Scandal

Vetting the Resident: Jerome Corsi: People of Interest in Obama's Forged Selective Service Card Scandal - VIDEO HERE Vetting the Resident: Jerome Corsi: Postal Worker and Obama Indonesian Citizen...

Wednesday, March 21, 2012


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 8:22 AM
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
communist obama marxist socialist maoist progressive
FAMOUS ARTIST'S NEW ART

OBAMA BURNING THE CONSTITUTION
VIDEO! Hollywood Producer: Bill Clinton Directly Told Me Barack Obama Not Eligible 03.20.12
Full-Blown Media Cover-Up of Obama Foreign Student Testimony ...Just Add It to the Long List

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 8:34 AM
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Naked Obama vs Sheriff Joe: Obama Jokes About His Forged Birth Certificate at White House

-image | boston.com- Naked Obama vs Sheriff Joe: Obama Jokes About His Forged Birth Certificate at White House - 3/20/12 - VIDEO HERE Congressman Cliff Stearns On Obama's Birth Certificate: Awaiting...

Hollywood Producer Bettina Viviano: Bill Clinton Directly Told Me Barack Obama Not Eligible

Bettina Viviano, Executive Producer of Adam Sandler's 'Jack and Jill' Movie: Bill Clinton Directly Told Me Obama Not Eligible to be President; 2008 and 2012 Election Fraud; Bill Ayers; Gloria Allred;...

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 8:30 AM
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Sunday, March 18, 2012

WND EXCLUSIVE

POLL: U.S. FACES CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS ON OBAMA

Americans finally getting message about possibly ineligible president

Published: 1 hour ago

Editor’s note: This is another in a series of “WND/WENZEL POLLS” conducted exclusively for WND by the public-opinion research and media consulting company Wenzel Strategies.

Questions have been raised about Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president since before his election, but with a mainstream media leading cheers for him there have been a lot of Americans who haven’t realized the seriousness of the situation – the possibility that the sitting president is ineligible and constitutionally devoid of authority to sign bills, set foreign policy or even host lavish parties for friends in the White 

That’s changing and a large part of the reason is that Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., conducted a six-month Cold Case Posse investigation and revealed that there is probable cause to believe there was forgery in the creation of the image of Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” and fraud in its presentation to the nation as a genuine document.

The evidence that the word has been reaching Americans comes in the latest WND/Wenzel Poll conducted exclusively for WND by the public-opinion research and media consulting company Wenzel Strategies.

It reveals that almost 40 percent of Americans – that would be somewhere in the range of 130 million or 140 million or so – now think the nation is facing a constitutional crisis because of a lack of documentation regarding Obama’s eligibility.

NOTE: In case you missed the news conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse,” you can view it here.

The scientific telephone survey was conducted March 10-13 and has a margin of error of 3.72 percentage points.

The poll reveals that 25.8 percent of respondents say they strongly agree with the statement that the country now is facing a constitution crisis on the issue of an eligible president. Another 13.7 percent say they somewhat agree.

Critics long have raised the question about the impact on the nation should Obama be proven to be ineligible. There would be many issues to consider: Are the laws he’s signed still laws? What about the money he’s spent? And how about the commitments he’s made to allies overseas? What about significant social changes he’s brought about, such as opening the U.S. military to open homosexuality?

Could any of those be reversed. And who would pay for that?

Or does anybody care?

Arpaio’s investigation, done by experienced law enforcement investigators as well as attorneys, was released only a few weeks ago, and has been serving to wake people up on the issue, Wenzel said, despite mainstream media efforts to keep the information under wraps.

The poll showed 11 percent of respondents are very familiar with the conclusions in Arpaio’s report, and another 19 percent are somewhat familiar. Still, nearly 70 percent were not very or not at all familiar, a tribute to the work of mainstream and influential media outlets to conceal the facts of the dispute.

The poll also showed that because of Arpaio’s report, 40 percent of the respondents now concede they are more likely to believe Obama in ineligible to hold the office of president. Another 20 percent said they weren’t able to express an opinion on that question.

Also, more than 46 percent said they agree that now there needs to be more extensive investigative work done into Obama’s eligibility to determine the facts, while 39 percent said they disagreed with that.

And then there was the key question about the nation facing a constitutional crisis.

At issue would be consequences like the fallout of court decisions made by judges appointed by Obama. There are two new U.S. Supreme Court judges, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, who owe their lifelong appointments to Obama.

But if Obama was ineligible to start, what about those appointments, and what about the decisions in which those judges have participated?

Respondents also were divided, with 30 percent saying media coverage that did occur of the Arpaio report was favorable to Obama and another 25 percent who said it opposed Obama. Significantly, 30 percent were “not sure.”

Wenzel suggested that the issue needs to be in the news, so people know about it, can do their research and make up their minds.

“This issue is very much like the government takeover of the national health care system engineered in the first two years of the Obama term in that it produces a visceral and negative reaction from many voters, but it requires constant discussion to keep it in the minds of voters. This is not a subject on which voters want to dwell, but forced to think about it, many react in a negative way,” Wenzel said.

“This may be the very reason Obama’s supporters in the mainstream media do not want this topic discussed, and there has been a concerted effort to marginalize those who raise questions about this issue,” he said.

“But the truth is that if Americans came to realize just how many of their neighbors harbor the same skepticism about Obama’s eligibility that they share, the political and societal ramifications could bring dramatic change to this nation,” he said.

He did note his concern is that Americans so far mostly have been content to “sit idly by while an apparent imposter raids their national treasury and runs their once-great nation into the ground.”

The issue is that while the Constitution requires a president to be a “natural born citizen” the documentation that would reveal that for Obama remains unrevealed.

Obama has refused to allow access to whatever original documentation there might be in the state of Hawaii, where he said he was born, as well as many other documents, such as passport records, kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois State Senate records and schedules, medical records, Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents, Soetoro/Dunham marriage license and adoption records.

There also are his critics who say that “natural born citizen” at the time the Constitution was written would have meant the offspring of two citizens of the country, and since Obama’s father was a foreign national, he would not qualify under that standard.

WND previously reported that some of the silence from the media may be due to threats that were issued to intimidate them.

Lead Cold Case Posse investigator Mike Zullo told WND, “During our investigation, we actually were told [that media] had been threatened with FTC investigations. Commentators [had been] threatened with their jobs.”

The threats were so intimidating that some individuals quit their positions over safety concerns for their families, he said.

Read the results of Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation.

See detailed results of survey questions:

Sheriff Arpaio’s report found that there is probable cause to believe Barack Obama is NOT eligible to serve as president, and that the birth certificate he released last year was a forgery. Based on this information, and whatever else you have heard about this investigation, were you more or less likely to believe that Obama is eligible to hold the office of the presidency?

Based on what you have learned from the Arpaio report, do you agree or disagree that there is a need for more extensive investigation into Obama’s eligibility to be president?

Based on the Arpaio report, do you agree or disagree that the country now faces a constitutional crisis regarding this issue?

Thinking about how the media has covered the release of this new report, do you agree or disagree that the story was reported appropriately, fairly and objectively, do you think that most of the news coverage was slanted in favor of Obama, or do you think that coverage was slanted against Obama?


Read the preliminary results of Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation.


Previous stories:

Obama ‘fanatic’ guilty in Arpaio death threat

Donald Trump: Say it is so, Sheriff Joe

O’Reilly: My probe better than Sheriff Joe’s

Arpaio: ‘Probable cause’ Obama certificate a fraud

What does law say about Obama’s eligibility?

Alinsky-style leftist ramps up effort to oust Sheriff Joe

100,000 line up to back Sheriff Joe

Obama backer arrested for death threats against Sheriff Joe

Justice Department blinks in battle against Sheriff Joe

Anti-Arpaio protesters ousted from meeting

Another protest against Sheriff Joe fails

Obama’s harassment of Sheriff Joe

‘Resign now’ protest against Sheriff Joe fizzles

Sheriff Joe targeted for ouster

Sheriff Joe ‘suspicious’ of motive behind Obama attacks

Sheriff Joe to Obama: I’ll keep doing my job

Arpaio gets death threats over Obama investigation

Sheriff Joe on Obama eligibility probe: ‘Where there’s smoke … ‘


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 5:19 PM
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Friday, March 09, 2012

Friday, March 9, 2012

Sarah Palin: McCain Campaign Managers Wouldn't Let Us Investigate Obama's Past

Video: Sarah Palin: McCain Campaign Managers Wouldn't Let Us Investigate Obama's Past - VIDEO HERE ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html- 19 Dec 2011: Wash Times...

Thursday, March 8, 2012

National Archives Confirm INS Records For Week Of Obama's Birth Mysteriously Missing

Arpaio investigation: Obama might be KenyanRecords that could document status mysteriously missingWorld Net Daily Among the records missing for Barack Obama that would be available for an ordinary president...

Publicado por Corazon7 @ 8:07 AM
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Thursday, March 08, 2012

jueves, 08 de marzo de 2012

WND VIDEO

'Smoking gun' in Breitbart mystery video

Major cover-up alleged in 2008 presidential campaign

Published: 13 hours ago

Barack Obama shown hugging leftist Harvard Professor Derrick Bell in 1991 video.

Video footage of President Obama during hiscollegeyears atHarvard Universitywas intentionally suppressed by news media andacademiaduring the 2008 presidential campaign in order to hide Obama’s connections with radical leftists, according to the editors of Breitbart.com, the website of late conservative activist Andrew Breitbart.

Tapes of Obama at Harvard in 1991 have now been posted online and aired on the Fox News Channel, and they show then-student Obama speaking warmly on behalf of a leftist professor, Derrick Bell.

“Open up your hearts and your minds to the words of Professor Derrick Bell,” Obama says during his speech before hugging him.

The embrace between the pair had been edited out of a video that was released earlier in the day by Buzzfeed. (Video of the embrace can be seen here.)

“This is just the beginning. And this video is a smoking gun showing that Barack Obama not only associated with radicals, he was their advocate,” said Breitbart editor Ben Shapiro.

Referring to Professor Bell, Shapiro explained, “This is a close associate of [controversial Obama Rev.] Jeremiah Wright, a man who was quoted by Jeremiah Wright regularly. This is a man who posited that the civil rights movement was too moderate because it accepted the status quo, and believed that the entire legal and constitutional system had to be transformed in radical fashion. This is a man so extreme that, as we’ve reported, he wrote a story in 1993 in which he posited that white Americans would sell black Americans into slavery to aliens to relieve the national debt, and that Jews would go along with it.”

Shapiro says the original video “was spliced and diced by the media to avoid showing just how close Obama was to Bell. More than that, a close associate of the Obama campaign, Harvard Law School’s Professor Charles Ogletree, admitted on our exclusive tape, ‘We hid this throughout the 2008 campaign. I don’t care if they find it now.’”

Portions of the tape had apparently been aired on PBS during the campaign four years ago, but without the audio of Obama’s statements and without video of Obama’s embrace of Bell.

“The media cover-up was very real. Ogletree’s cover-up was very real,” Shapiro said.

The videos were broadcast tonight on “Hannity” on Fox News, where columnists Juan Williams and Michelle Malkin were asked to weigh in on their content. (Video of “Hannity” can be seen here.)

“I thought this was going to be so much more,” said Williams. “I thought it was going to be a smoking gun. … But it really didn’t come to much.”

Malkin disagreed vehemently.

“I reject this idea that we should just shrug our shoulders and buy the PBS/Buzzfeed line that ‘There’s nothing new here.’ Stop it!” Malkin exclaimed.

“This is news. They didn’t want to talk about it then, and they don’t want to talk about it now. Do you think it’s a coincidence of timing that Barack Obama has now hired people to put out some 17-minute documentary? This is all about the Alinskyite control of who tells the story.”

Breitbart editors say today’s release was just the beginning.

“We’ve got plenty more and a lot will be released next week,” Shapiro said.

WND reported earlier that Andrew Breitbart had been investigating Obama just before the activist’s sudden death March 1, which is being probed by a coronor.

He told a crowd at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington he had obtained videos of Obama from the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee’s college days.

“I’ve got videos, by the way. This election we’re going to vet him. I’ve got videos – this election we’re going to vet him – from his college days to show you why … racial division and class warfare are central to what hope and change was sold in 2008,” Breitbart told CPAC.

He said the videos would reveal Obama during a time when he was meeting a “bunch of silver ponytails” – referring to Weather Underground terror group members Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

It was in the couple’s Chicago home that Obama’s political career reportedly was launched, and his ties to the two run deep. There’s been a solid argument made that Ayers ghost-wrote Obama’s highly acclaimed memoir, “Dreams from My Father.”

The possibility of videos producing revelations about Obama’s college days is significant, as Obama has carefully kept concealed evidence about his life during the time he reportedly attended Occidental College in California and later two East Coast schools.

A lawsuit at one point obtained an order for Occidental to reveal Obama’s student records. The aim was to find out whether he obtained aid or assistance as a foreign student, lending credibility to the argument that he does not qualify to be president under the Constitution’s “natural-born citizen” requirement.

The video posted by Buzzfeed without the embrace:

Interest in the issue of Obama’s eligibility skyrocketed recently when an investigative team commission by Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., said there is probable cause that the document released by the White House last year as President Obama’s birth certificate is a computer-generated forgery.

At a news conference, lead investigator Mike Zullo said his team believes the Hawaii Department of Health has engaged in a systematic effort to hide from public inspection any original 1961 birth records it may have in its possession.

“Officers of the Hawaii Department of Health and various elected Hawaiian public officials may have intentionally obscured 1961 birth records and procedures to avoid having to release to public inspection and to the examination of court-authorized forensic examiners any original Obama 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may or may not have,” Zullo said.

NOTE: In case you missed the news conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse,” you can view it here.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 1:28 PM
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar

Memo to Clongress: Impeach Probe Needed Now!


2008 swearing in of President Barrack Obama.

Barack Obama is indeed succeeding in his plans to “transform America,” but not in the way voters expected on Election Day in 2008. The number of the president’s actions that arguablyqualify as impeachable offenses is staggering.

The question before the country is what to do about it.

True, Obama faces the voters in 8-9 months, and that will be seen by many as a reason to avoid the turmoil of an impeachment proceeding. But one process has nothing to do with the other. Elections proceed on an established calendar, but if he has committed acts that warrant removal by way of impeachment, that process should proceed independent of the election calendar. While impeachment must never be used to override an election victory, neither should the prospects of electoral defeat be used as an argument to avoid impeachment.

Constitution of the United States of America (...

Obama has demonstrated contempt for the Constitution and is increasingly resorting to rule by decree. He is recognized by a growing number of Americans as a danger to the republic – certainly a danger to our liberties and also a serious threat to our national security.

It is time for the House of Representatives to take its constitutional responsibility seriously and launch an impeachment investigation. The investigative committee should hold hearings, collect and weigh the evidence, and then present its findings to the Congress and the nation.

Has Obama committed “high crimes and misdemeanors” that warrant impeachment and removal? There is much evidence that says, yes, he has.

A special report with evidence galore: “The Case for Impeachment: Why Barack Hussein Obama Should be Impeached to Save America”just $4.95!

Impeachment of the president is justified on constitutional grounds if any of the following 12 questions is answered in the affirmative:

  • Did President Obama have personal knowledge of the illegal “Fast and Furious” project run by ATF and approved by top officials in the Department of Justice, a plan to sell over 2,000 guns to Mexican drug cartels, weapons now linked to numerous crimes on both sides of the border including the murder ofBorder Patrol Agent Brian Terry?
  • Did the president have knowledge of the ongoing effort by Attorney General Eric Holder and other Justice Department officials to cover up the true purpose and scope of that ill-conceived, illegal project?
  • Did the president direct his appointees on the National Labor Relations Board to bring a lawsuit against Boeing as a political payoff to organized labor?
  • Did the president act contrary to the advice and pleas of his own CIA director, four previous intelligence agency heads of both parties and numerous experts on covert operations when, on April 16, 2009, he made public four internal Justice Department memos on terrorist interrogation techniques, thereby deliberately emasculating our anti-terrorist intelligence operations and endangering the lives of many intelligence agents?
  • Did the president have knowledge of a plan by the Department of Homeland Security, ordered by Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano and the deputy commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, David Aguilar, to distort and falsify the Border Patrol’s southwest border illegal-alien apprehension numbers by means of a deliberate, planned undercount – for the purpose of misleading the public and Congress about the true (abysmal) state of border security?
  • By choosing not to secure the border against unlawful entry, has the president willfully disregarded his clear duty under Article IV, Section 4, of the Constitution to protect the states from foreign invasion? Did the president admit this in a candid exchange with Sen. Jon Kyl, telling him the reason he was not stopping the cross-border human trafficking was to force Republicans in Congress to strike a deal for amnesty legislation?
  • Is the president showing contempt for the Constitution, the separation of powers and the rule of law by ordering an “administrative amnesty” for millions of illegal aliens through the implementation of the John Morton memo of June 2011?
  • Has the president demonstrated contempt for the Constitution and violated the separation of powers by issuing numerous executive orders and agency rules that have no basis in statute and often contradict congressional votes against such actions?
  • Did the president authorize Labor Secretary Hilda Solis to violate current federal laws against aiding and abetting illegal aliens by signing agreements with foreign countries and pledging to protect and fund educational efforts to inform illegal aliens of their workplace “rights”? Also did these “agreements” she signed with foreign countries violate Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution which clearly establishes the manner in which treaties are to be undertaken and ratified?
  • Did the president violate his oath of office when he instructed the Department of Justice not to defend the Defense of Marriage Act in federal courts? Does the Constitution permit the person designated by Article II, Section 1, as holding the “executive power” of government to decide unilaterally to not enforce a law he disagrees with?
  • Did the president authorize or approve the offer of a federal job to Rep. Joe Sestek if he would withdraw from the 2010 Democratic primary race for U.S. senator in Pennsylvania?
  • Did the president violate the War Powers Act by conducting military operations in Libya beyond the 60-day limitation?

If the president is not guilty of any of these crimes, then a thorough investigation by a House committee with subpoena power will clear the air. If he is guilty, then the U.S. House of Representatives has a moral obligation to vote for a resolution of impeachment, and the U.S. Senate must bring him to trial.

If the leaders of the House believe that some or all of these actions are indeed impeachable offenses but nonetheless refuse to launch a formal investigation to ascertain all the facts, then there are two parties involved in Obama’s assault on the Constitution – the perpetrators and their accomplices. In layman’s terms, Obama and his radical cronies are busy robbing the bank, while the House Republican leadership waits in the getaway car.

If some or all of the allegations are adopted as true by the House but rejected by the Senate as inadequate grounds for removal, that means the president of the United States can ignore the particulars of his oath to defend the Constitution. It means he can govern by edict instead of “taking care to faithfully execute the laws of the United States.” It means that Barack Obama has indeed succeeded in his plans to “transform America.” It means we are perilously close to crossing the line between constitutional republic and dictatorship.

There is no question that the impeachment and removal of Barack Obama is within the proper scope and purpose of the Constitution’s impeachment provisions.

The history of the nation’s two presidential impeachment cases shows that although treason and bribery are the only crimes mentioned by name, this does not limit Congress’ authority to bring an indictment on other serious charges. Constitutionally speaking, “high crimes and misdemeanors” can mean almost anything Congress in its wisdom wants it to mean.

Clearly, the authors of the Constitution did not intend that presidents should be vulnerable to removal for light or petty reasons, hence the use of the adjective “high” in front of the words “crimes and misdemeanors.” Nevertheless, what constitutes a “high crime” is up to Congress to decide.

It is also clear from history that the identification and naming of impeachable offenses is as much a political judgment as a legal one. The assignment of separate and distinct roles to the House and the Senate – and the two-thirds vote requirement for conviction and removal – were deemed by the founders as sufficient safeguards against removal of a president for transient or narrowly partisan reasons.

We learned that lesson forcefully in the Clinton impeachment case. Politics can and will play a part in the process, but that is expected and entirely consistent with constitutional principles.

President Clinton was charged with two counts each of perjury and obstruction of justice. The House thought the crimes serious enough to adopt the impeachment resolution in December of 1998. Two months later, the Senate disagreed and voted for acquittal – or more precisely, failed to muster the required two-thirds vote for conviction. In the House vote, only five Democrats voted for impeachment, and in the Senate, not a single Democrat voted for conviction. So much for keeping politics out of the courtroom.

The peculiar and revealing thing about those two Clinton impeachment votes is that no one seriously doubted the guilt of the president on the perjury and obstruction charges. But Democrats in Congress believed that even if true, the charges did not warrant removal from office. They reasoned that the charges dealt with a private matter – Clinton’s sexual escapades – and not government business.

The Clinton case illustrates that for both Democrats and Republicans, in the last analysis, what is an impeachable offense is inevitably a political question as much as a legal one. Scholars and lawyers may have an opinion, but Congress’ opinion is the only one that matters. Congress’ supreme authority on impeachment questions is as much an embodiment of our separation of powers doctrine as the president’s broad prerogatives in foreign policy.

Admittedly, the likelihood of the present Democrat-controlled Senate casting a two-thirds vote for conviction and removal is almost zero. However, this does not discharge the House from its constitutional obligation to pursue the matter if – in their considered judgment – the evidence warrants.

The questions posed above all relate to actions affecting national security and unlawful political intervention in the execution of our nation’s laws – not mere policy differences. Obama’s disastrous economic policies, his ideological war against domestic energy production and his reckless proposals to add new trillions to our national debt– all are policies that are damaging to our nation’s well-being. However, such policies are not in themselves impeachable crimes. His contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law is a different matter altogether.


It is our distinct honor to now carry the commentaries and reports of Tom Tancredo, former Representative to Congress of the State of Colorado and 2008 candidate for U.S. President. His CongressmanTomTancredo.comregularly features his articles, as does WorldNetDaily.

Former Congressman Tancredo currently serves as chairman of Rocky Mountain Foundation, co-chairman of the anti-illegal immigration Team America PAC, and honorary chairman of Youth for Western Civilization. He speaks frequently on cable news, talk radio, and on college campuses – where his mere presence has led leftists to riot on multiple occasions. His book, In Mortal Danger: The Battle for America’s Border and Security was published in 2006.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 12:36 PM
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar
Tuesday, March 06, 2012


So, who is Barry Soetoro?

Showdown: Sheriff Arpaio vs. the legend of Barry Soetoro as Barack Hussein Obama II

image

Last week, the six-month investigation Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to be the President of the United States by a commissioned law enforcement body concluded with a press conference by Joe Arpaio, Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona. Among their investigative findings was the conclusion that there has been a systematic effort to obscure the truth about Obama, including but not limited to his birth certificate, selective service registration and citizenship status. Catching our attention as investigators was one finding in particular: records were missing from the national archives.

Specifically, records from the Immigration and Naturalization Service documenting the identities of individuals entering the U.S. on international flights from foreign countries were missing. More specifically, only the records for the period between August 1-7, 1961 were gone and presumably removed from the archives, while all other time periods remained intact.

Our investigative report published on April 8, 2011, provided readers with this very same finding, except larger in scope. We noted that “the scrubbing and altering of records pertaining to Obama began well before he became an Illinois state senator in the 1996 election cycle. The ‘scrubbing’ or alteration of records did not begin or end with Obama, but also extended to his mother and other associates as well.”

As investigators, researchers and investigative journalists, we’ve seen this happen before. We’re also familiar with the “template of denial” used by the fact-a-phobic media in response to such findings. Simply ignore the facts.

Communist ties that… mysteriously vanish

One notable case is documented by M. Stanton Evans in his book Blacklisted by History, The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy. While conducting research for his book, he traveled to the National Archives to view a 106-page report dated August 3, 1946. The report, known as the “Klaus memo,” identified Communist Party members, Soviet agents and their facilitators working within the U.S. State Department.

He writes that the document should exist in two locations at the National Archives. The report was missing from one location, while a notice of removal from March 1993, nearly a half-century after it was written, was found in its place in the other. Other documents entrusted to the National Archives were also found to be missing, some leaving only their covers in place.

The scrubbing of records were not limited to official or government sources - they extended to the private sector as well. Newspaper archives from the McCarthy era, at that time frequently “regional” in nature, were not only missing from the newspaper morgues, they were also expunged from area library archives as well.

Regardless of one’s beliefs on the eligibility issue, the successful censoring of information vital to the history and security of the United States should convince even the most hardened skeptics that we have “enemies within.”

So, who is Barry Soetoro?

What does the scrubbing of McCarthy-era records and documents have to do with Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro? Much, it appears.

The same tactics used by Communist enemies of our nation to revise history by removing or changing it have been uncovered by our investigation and now by the official commissioned law enforcement body spearheaded by Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Given the numerous findings by multiple investigative journalists, including Andrew Breirbart, of direct ties between the current occupant of the Oval Office to active communists and socialists and their ideologies, it would be perilous to our nation to continue to ignore the “legend” of Barack Hussein Obama. We must demand accountability from our current elected officials, and coverage by our “conservative” talk show hosts. We must not wait for the 2012 elections to demand the official vetting of Barry Soetoro, or is it Barack Hussein Obama?

Is it possible that we really don’t know, with absolute certainty, even the legal name of the sitting U.S. president? Sadly, yes. If you contend otherwise, you have not been paying attention to the biggest scam ever perpetrated on a slumbering populace.

The proverbial devil is in the details - or the conspicuous absence of them.


Publicado por Corazon7 @ 2:16 PM
Comentarios (0)  | Enviar